The Diatom Nanofrustulum shiloi as a Promising Species in Modern Biotechnology

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The article presents the results of studies of intensive culture of a new species of bentoplanktonic diatom N. shiloi (Lee, Reimer et McEnery) Round, Hallsteinsen et Paasche 1999 for the Black Sea. The features of the process of isolating the species into an algologically pure culture, as well as the morphological and taxonomic characteristics of the strain in light and electron scanning microscopes are described in detail. The biochemical and production characteristics of the strain were studied, as well as the ability to accumulate fucoxanthin (Fx) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) in laboratory conditions. In the exponential growth phase, the specific culture growth rate was µ=0.8 1/day, and the maximum productivity P = 0.46 g dry weight /(L day). The accumulation of PUFAs in the biomass of N. shiloi reached 67.39 mg/g dry weight of algae. The Fx concentration in the biomass at the beginning of the stationary growth phase was 10 mg/g dry weight. The fairly high rate of Fx biosynthesis in microalgae cells, as well as the composition of fatty acids of the Black Sea strain, make it possible to classify N. shiloi as a promising object in biotechnology.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

A. Blaginina

Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas of Russian Academy of Sciences

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: aablaginina@gmail.com
俄罗斯联邦, Sevastopol

S. Zheleznova

Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas of Russian Academy of Sciences; Kutateladze Institute of Thermophysics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciencies

Email: aablaginina@gmail.com
俄罗斯联邦, Sevastopol; Novosibirsk

E. Miroshnichenko

Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas of Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: aablaginina@gmail.com
俄罗斯联邦, Sevastopol

R. Gevorgiz

Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas of Russian Academy of Sciences; Kutateladze Institute of Thermophysics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciencies

Email: aablaginina@gmail.com
俄罗斯联邦, Sevastopol; Novosibirsk

L. Ryabushko

Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas of Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: aablaginina@gmail.com
俄罗斯联邦, Sevastopol

参考

  1. Vázquez-Romero B., Perales J.A., Pereira H., Barbosa M., Ruiz J. // Sci. Total. Environ. 2022. V. 837. P. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155742.
  2. Ahmed S.F., Mofijur M., Parisa T.A., Islam N., Kusumo F., Inayat A. et al.// Chemosphere. 2022. V. 286. Part 1. P. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131656.
  3. Maghzian A., Aslani A., Zahedi R. // Energy Reports. 2022. V. 8. № . 4. P. 3337–3349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.02.125.
  4. Revellame E.D., Aguda R., Chistoserdov A., Fortela D.L., Hernandez R.A., Zappi M.E. // Algal Research. 2021. V. 55. № . 5. P. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2021.102258.
  5. Wang S., Verma S.K., Said I.H., Thomsen L., Ullrich M.S., Kuhnert N. // Microb. Cell. Fact. 2018. V. 17. № . 1. P. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-018-0957-0.
  6. Supramaetakorn W., Meksumpun S., Ichimi K., Thawonsode N., Veschasit O.-I. // J. Fish. Environ. 2019. V. 43. № . 3. P. 1–10.
  7. Жузе А.П., Прошкина-Лавренко А.И., Шешукова В.С. Диатомовый анализ. Книга 1. Том 1. / Ред. А. И. Прошкина-Лавренко. М.-Л.: Государственное издательство геологической литературы, 1949. 239 с.
  8. Kuczynska P., Jemiola-Rzeminska M., Strzalka K. // Mar. Drugs. 2015. V. 13. № . 9. P. 5847–5881. https://doi.org/10.3390/md13095847
  9. Геворгиз Р.Г., Железнова С. Н. // Морской биологический журнал. 2020. Т. 5, № 1. С. 12–19. https://doi.org/10.21072/mbj.2020.05.1.02
  10. Dang N.P., Vasskog T., Pandey A., Calay R.K. // Int. J. Biol. Ecolog. Eng.. 2022. V. 16. № . 12. P. 108–112.
  11. Silva B.F., Wendt E.V., Castro J.C., Oliveira A.E., Carrim A.J.I., Gonçalves Vieira J.D., et al. // Algal Research. 2015. V. 9. P. 312–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2015.04.010
  12. Jaramillo-Madrid A.C., Ashworth J., Ralph P. J. // J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020. V. 8. № . 2. P. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8020085
  13. Геворгиз Р.Г., Гуреев М.А., Железнова С.Н., Гуреева Е.В., Нехорошев М.В. // Прикл.биохимия и микробиология. 2022. Т. 58. № 3.
  14. Eilertsen H.C., Eriksen G.K., Bergum J-S., Strømholt J., Elvevoll E., Eilertsen K-E. et al.// Appl. Sci. 2022. V. 12. № 6. P. 1–35. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12063082
  15. Blaginina A., Ryabushko L. // Int. J. on Algae. 2021. V. 23. № . 3. P. 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1615/InterJAlgae.v23.i3.40
  16. Round F.E., Hallsteinsen H., Paasche E. // Diatom Research. 1999. V. 14. № . 2. P. 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269249X.1999.9705476
  17. Woelfel J., Schoknecht A., Schaub I., Enke N., Schumann R., Karsten U. // Phycol. 2014. V. 53. № . 6. P. 639–651.
  18. Sahin M.S., Khazi M.I., Demirel Z., Dalay M.C. // Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnol. 2019. V. 17. P. 390–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2018.12.023
  19. Demirel Z., Imamoglu E., Dalay M.C. // Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2020a. V. 63. № . 4. P. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4324-2020190201
  20. Grubišić M., Šantek B., Zorić Z., Čošić Z., Vrana I., Gašparović B. et al. // Molecules. 2022. V. 27. № . 4. P. 1–27. doi: 10.3390/molecules27041248.
  21. Рябушко В.И., Железнова С.Н., Нехорошев М.В. // Аlgologia. 2017. Т. 27. № . 1. С. 15–21. https://doi.org/10.15407/alg27.01.015
  22. Bae M., Kim M.-B., Park Y.-K., Lee J.-Y. // Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids. 2020. V. 1865. № . 11. P. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2020.158618
  23. Рябушко Л.И. Микрофитобентос Черного моря. / Ред. А. В. Гаевская. Севастополь: ЭКОСИ-Гидрофизика, 2013. 416 c.
  24. Guillard R.R.L., Ryther J. // Can. J. Microbiol. 1963. V. 8. № . 2. P. 229–239 https://doi.org/10.1139/m62-029.
  25. Агатова А.И., Аржанова Н.В., Лапина Н.М., Налетова И.А., Торгунова Н.И. Руководство по современным биохимическим методам исследования водных экосистем, перспективных для промысла и марикультуры / Ред А. И. Агатовой. М.: ВНИРО, 2004. 123 с.
  26. Hashimoto T., Ozaki Y., Taminato M., Dass S.K., Mizuno M., Yoshimura K. et al. // British Journal of Nutrition. 2009. V. 102. № . 2. P. 242–248. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114508199007.
  27. Kates M. Techniques of Lipidology. Isolation, Analysis and Identification of Lipids. /Ed. T. S. Work, E. Work. Amsterdam; North Holland Publ. 1972. V. 3. Part II. P. 347–390.
  28. Sar E.A., Sunesen I. // Nova Hedwigia. 2003. V. 77. № . 3–4. P. 399–406. https://doi.org/10.1127/0029-5035/2003/0077-0399
  29. Геворгиз Р.Г., Железнова С.Н., Зозуля Ю.В., Уваров И.П., Репков А.П., Лелеков А.С. // Актуальные вопросы биологической физики и химии. БФФХ-2016: Севастополь. 2016. Т. 1. C. 73–77.
  30. Naumov I.V., Gevorgiz R.G., Skripkin S.G., Tintulova M.V., Tsoy M.A., Sharifullin B.R. // Chemical Engineering and Processing – Process Intensification. 2023b. V. 191. P. 1–12. https://doi.org/j.cep.2023.109467
  31. Лелеков А.С., Геворгиз Р.Г., Жондарева Я.Д. // Прикладная биохимия и микробиология. 2016. Т. 52. № . 3. C. 333–338. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0555109916030090
  32. Тренкеншу Р.П. // Экол. моря. 2005. Вып. 67. C. 98–110.
  33. Xia S., Wang K., Wan L., Li A., Hu Q., Zhang C. // Mar. Drugs. 2013. V. 11. № . 7. P. 2667–2681. https://doi.org/10.3390/md11072667.
  34. De Castro Araújo S., Tavano Garcia V.M. // Aquaculture. 2005. V. 246. № . 1–4. P. 405–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.051
  35. Li H.-Y., Lu Y., Zheng J.-W., Yang W.-D., Liu J.-S. // Mar. Drugs. 2014. V. 12. № . 1. P. 153–166. https://doi.org/10.3390/md12010153.
  36. Spilling K., Seppälä J., Schwenk D., Rischer H., Tamminen T. // J Appl Phycol. 2021. V. 33. P. 1447–1455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-021-02380-9
  37. Cointet E., Wielgosz-Collin G., Bougaran G., Rabesaotra V., Gonçalves O., Méléder V. // PLoS ONE. 2019. V. 14. № . 11. P. 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224701
  38. Sprynskyy M., Monedeiro F., Monedeiro-Milanowski M., Nowak Z., Krakowska-Sieprawska A., Pomastowski P. et al. // Algal Research. 2022. V. 62. P. 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2021.102615
  39. Preston M.R. // Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2019. V. 21. № 1. P. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-019-0762-1
  40. Wang H., Zhang Y., Chen L., Cheng W., Liu T. // Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2018. V. 41. № . 7. P. 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-018-1935-y
  41. Гладышев М.И. // Журнал Cибирского федерального университета. Серия: Биология. 2012. Т. 5. № . 4. С. 352–386.
  42. Yang R., Wei D., Xie J. // Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2020. V. 40. № . 7. P. 993–1009. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2020.1805402
  43. Gevorgiz R.G., Gureev M.A., Zheleznova S.N., Gureeva E.V., Nechoroshev M.V. // Appl.ed Biochem. Microbiol. 2022. V. 58, № . 3. P. 261–268. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0003683822010033
  44. Erdoğan A., Demirel Z., Dalay M.C., Eroğlu A.E. // Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2016. V. 16. № . 3. P. 499–506. https://doi.org/10.4194/1303-2712-v16_3_01

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载
2. Fig. 1. Laboratory setup for intensive cultivation of the diatom alga N. shiloi

下载 (36KB)
索引源数据
3. Fig. 2. SEM image of N. shiloi on the surface of plastic substrates: a – external and b – internal view of the valves, arrows indicate one apical pore at both ends of the axial field. Scale: 1 µm [15].

下载 (24KB)
索引源数据
4. Fig. 3. N. shiloi cells in mixed cultures with cyanobacteria: Leptolyngbya sp. (a) and Stanieria sp. (b) in CM (scale bar 10 µm).

下载 (45KB)
索引源数据
5. Fig. 4. Monoculture of N. shiloi, valves from different angles in SEM: a – cells in chains, scale: 10 µm; b – single cell, c, d – cells connected in pairs by marginal spines, scale: 1 µm.

下载 (63KB)
索引源数据
6. Fig. 5. CM image of N. shiloi monoculture, scale bar 10 µm.

下载 (47KB)
索引源数据
7. Fig. 6. The ability of N. shiloi to settle to the bottom of a laboratory beaker in 1 min (a), in 3 h (b).

下载 (38KB)
索引源数据
8. Fig. 7. Dynamics of N. shiloi biomass in intensive culture on nutrient media F and 5F. For the cumulative curve 5F, the numbers indicate the growth phases: 1 - exponential, 2 - deceleration, 3 - stationary. For the cumulative curve F, the productivity in the linear growth phase was calculated using equation (2) (marked in red) PF/2 = 0.05 g / (L day), R2 = 0.99. The specific growth rate in the exponential phase for the cumulative curve 5F was calculated using equation (1) (marked in blue) µ = 0.8 1 /day, R2 = 0.99. The dots indicate the average values, the standard deviation for all measurements did not exceed 0.01 g / L. The arrow indicates the moment of measurement of FA and fucoxanthin.

下载 (13KB)
索引源数据
9. Fig. 8. Biotechnological characteristics of the diatom alga N. shiloi.

下载 (98KB)
索引源数据

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024