Effectiveness of Regional Insurance Networks and the European Stability Mechanism

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The article is dedicated to approaches to assessing the effectiveness of re- gional insurance networks in comparison with classic financial institutions established under the auspices of the UN – International Monetary Fund and World Bank Group. On the basis of the evolution of the anti-crisis tools of international financial organisations, the place of regional financial mechanisms (regional insurance networks) is analysed as a new form of debasement of financial imbalances of the region, mitigating certain shortcomings of the IMF anti-crisis regulation model. Close attention is paid to the taxonomy of the Regional Financial Arrangements (RFA) in terms of forming a resource base and directions of the use of funds, their integration into global safety networks. The European Stability Mechanism is understood as a specified form of the RFA, which has the largest resources, the possibility of attracting them on a market basis and an extended range of areas of use. The author used specially tailored criteria to assess the effectiveness of the RFA in terms of lock of crisis events at the regional level. It is concluded that the RFA can only partially be considered as a lender of last resort for a group of major states, while a special model of the functioning of the European Stability Mechanism allowed to solve the tasks of anti-crisis regulation in the EU.

作者简介

A. Navoy

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

Email: Ant.navoy@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7058-4257
Doctor of Sciences (Economy), Associate Professor, Professor Moscow, Russia

参考

  1. Бобров А.В. (2022) Трансформация денежно-кредитной политики ЕС в условиях финансовой нестабильности. Мировая экономика и международные отношения. № 2. С. 33‒41. doi: 10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-2-33-41.
  2. Купреев С.С. (2008) К вопросу о юридической природе международных финансовых организаций. Международное публичное и частное право. № 4. С. 6‒9.
  3. Навой А.В. (2022а) Трансформация роли России в мировой финансовой архитектуре в условиях геополитических вызовов. Финансовый журнал. № 6. С. 111‒123. doi: 10.31107/2075-1990-2022-6-111-123.
  4. Навой А.В. (2022b) Трансформация функции МВФ и сотрудничество с Россией. Современная Европа. № 7. С. 107‒119. doi: 10.31857/S0201708322070099.
  5. Carreau D. (1994) Why not Merge the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (World Bank). Fordham Law Review. Vol. 62. Issue 7. P. 1989–2000.
  6. Eichengreen B. (2012) Regional Financing Arrangements and the International Monetary Fund. ADBI Working paper. No. 394. Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo, Japan. 18 p.
  7. ESM (2023) 2022 ESM Annual Report. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, Luxembourg. 119 p. doi: 10.2852/120015.
  8. Iancu A., Kim S., Miksjuk A. (2021) Global Financial Safety Net ‒ A Lifeline for an Uncertain World. IMFBlog. 30.11. URL: https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2021/11/30/global-financial-safety-net-a-lifeline-for-an-uncertain-world (accessed: 01.09.2023).
  9. IMF (2013) Stocktaking the Fund’s Engagement with Regional Financing Arrangements. International Monetary Fund, Washington, USA. 46 p.
  10. IMF (2015) Financing for Development: Enhancing the Financial Safety Net for Developing Countries. International Monetary Fund, Washington, USA. 29 p.
  11. IMF (2016) Adequacy of the global financial safety net. International Monetary Fund, Washington, USA. 48 p.
  12. IMF (2017) Collaboration Between Regional Financing Arrangements and the IMF. International Monetary Fund, Washington, USA. 42 p.
  13. Kawai A. (2009) Reform of the International Financial Architecture: An Asian Perspective. ADBI Working Paper. No. 167. Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo, Japan. 31 p.
  14. Lamberte M., Peter J. Morgan (2012) Regional and Global Monetary Cooperation. ADBI Working Paper. No. 346. Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo, Japan. 27 p.
  15. Obstfeld M. (2011) The International Monetary System: Living with Asymmetry. NBER Working Paper. No. 17641. 56 p. doi: 10.3386/w17641.
  16. Perks M., Rao Y., Shin J., Tokuoka K. (2021) Evolution of Bilateral Swap Lines. IMF Working Paper. No. 21/210. International Monetary Fund, Washington, USA. 40 p.
  17. Sussangkarn C. (2010). Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralization: Origin, Development and Outlook. ADBI Working Paper. No. 230. Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo, Japan. 16 p.
  18. Bobrov А.V. (2022) Transformaciya denezhno-kreditnoj politiki ES v usloviyah finansovoj nestabil'nosti [Transformation of EU monetary policy in the context of financial instability], Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2, pp. 33‒41. doi: 10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-2-33-41 (In Russian).
  19. Carreau D. (1994) Why not Merge the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (World Bank), Fordham Law Review, 62(7), pp. 1989–2000.
  20. Eichengreen B. (2012) Regional Financing Arrangements and the International Monetary Fund, ADBI Working paper, 394, Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo, Japan
  21. ESM (2022) 2021 ESM Annual Report, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, Luxembourg. doi: 10.2852/200351
  22. Iancu A., Kim S., Miksjuk A. (2021) Global Financial Safety Net ‒ A Lifeline for an Uncertain World, IMFBlog, 30.11. URL: https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2021/11/30/global-financial-safety-net-a-lifeline-for-an-uncertain-world (accessed: 01.09.2023).
  23. IMF (2013) Stocktaking the Fund’s Engagement with Regional Financing Arrangements, International Monetary Fund, Washington, USA.
  24. IMF (2015) Financing for Development: Enhancing the Financial Safety Net for Developing Countries, International Monetary Fund, Washington, USA.
  25. IMF (2016) Adequacy of the global financial safety net, International Monetary Fund, Washington, USA.
  26. IMF (2017) Collaboration Between Regional Financing Arrangements and the IMF, International Monetary Fund, Washington, USA.
  27. Kawai A. (2009) Reform of the International Financial Architecture: An Asian Perspective, ADBI Working Paper, 167, Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
  28. Kupreyev S.S. (2008) K voprosu o yuridicheskoy prirode mezhdunarodnykh finansovykh organizatsiy [To the question of the legal nature of international financial organizations], Mezhdunarodnoye publichnoye i chastnoye pravo, 4, pp. 6‒9. (In Russian).
  29. Lamberte M., Peter J. Morgan (2012) Regional and Global Monetary Cooperation, ADBI Working Paper, 346, Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
  30. Navoy А.V. (2022b) Transformaciya funkcii MVF i sotrudnichestvo s Rossiej [Transformation of the IMF function and cooperation with Russia], Sovremennaya Evropa, 7, pp. 107‒119. doi: 10.31857/S0201708322070099 (In Russian).
  31. Navoy А.V. (2022а) Transformaciya roli Rossii v mirovoj finansovoj arhitekture v usloviyah geopoliticheskih vyzovov [Transforming Russia's Role in Global Financial Architecture Amid Geopolitical Challenges], Finansovyj zhurnal, 6, pp. 111‒123. doi: 10.31107/2075-1990-2022-6-111-123 (In Russian).
  32. Obstfeld M. (2011) The International Monetary System: Living with Asymmetry, NBER Working Paper, 17641. doi: 10.3386/w17641.
  33. Perks M., Rao Y., Shin J., Tokuoka K. (2021) Evolution of Bilateral Swap Lines, IMF Working Paper, 21/210, International Monetary Fund, Washington, USA.
  34. Sussangkarn C. (2010) Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralization: Origin, Development and Outlook, ADBI Working Paper, 230, Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo, Japan.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024