Coping (sovladanie) in the context of self-regulation. Part 1. Conceptual problems and challenges

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The article is devoted to the consideration of the current state of the problem of coping with difficult life situations through the prism of L.I. Antsyferova`s methodological critique. Various views on the specifics of difficult situations generating coping reactions are analyzed and their connection to K. Jaspers` concept of borderline situations characterized by the need for change is shown. The relationships between coping constructs, and coping and psychological defense, is considered. Self-regulation is proposed as a general theoretical context encompassing all the processes being considered, with coping processes being a special case.

作者简介

D. Leontiev

HSE University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: dleontiev@hse.ru

ScD in Psychology, Professor, Head of International Laboratory for Positive Psychology of Personality and Motivation

俄罗斯联邦, 101000, Moscow, Myasnitskaya str., 20

参考

  1. Antsyferova L.I. Razvitie lichnosti i problemy gerontopsikhologii. 2nd ed. Moscow: Publ. “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2006. 512 p. (In Russian)
  2. Asmolov A.G. Psikhologiya lichnosti: Kul’turno-istoricheskoe ponimanie razvitiya cheloveka. 3rd ed. Moscow: Smysl; Akademiya, 2007. 526 p. (In Russian)
  3. Vasilyuk F.E. Psikhologiya perezhivaniya. Moscow: Publ. MSU, 1984. 200 p. (In Russian)
  4. Vlasova O.A. Antinomizm pogranichnogo opyta v ekzistentsial’no-fenomenologicheskoi traditsii: ot filosofii k neironaukam I psikhoterapii. In: D.A. Leontiev (Ed.). Vos’maya Vserossiiskaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya po ekzistentsial’noi psikhologii, Materialy soobshenii. Moscow: Smysl, 2024. P. 11–17. (In Russian).
  5. Granovskaya R.M. Psikhologicheskaya zashchita. Saint-Petersburg: Rech’, 2007. 474 p. (In Russian)
  6. Ivanova T.Yu., Leont’ev D.A., Osin E.N. et al. Sovremennye problemy izucheniya lichnostnykh resursov v professional’noi deyatel’nosti. Organizatsionnaya psikhologiya. 2018. V. 8. №1. P. 85–121. (In Russian)
  7. Kirshbaum E.I., Eremeeva A.I. Psikhologicheskaya zashchita. Moscow: Smysl, 2000. 179 p. (In Russian)
  8. Kryukova T.L. Chelovek kak sub”ekt sovladayushchego povedeniya. In: A.L. Zhuravlev, T.L. Kryukova, E.A. Sergienko (Eds.). Sovladayushchee povedenie: Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy. Moscow: Publ. “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2008. P. 55–66. (In Russian)
  9. Leontiev D.A. Udary sud’by kak stimuly lichnostnogo razvitiya: fenomen posttravmaticheskogo rosta. In: A.V. Makhnach, L.G. Dikaya (Eds.). Zhiznesposobnost’ cheloveka: individual’nye, professional’nye i sotsial’nye aspekty. Moscow: Publ. “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2016. P. 144–158. (In Russian)
  10. Leontiev D.A. Lichnostnyi potentsial kak sostavlyayushchaya chelovecheskogo potentsiala. In: L.N. Ovcharova, V.A. Anikin, P.S. Sorokin (Eds.). Chelovecheskii potentsial: sovremennye traktovki i rezul’taty issledovanii. Moscow: VCIOM, 2023. P. 50–65. (In Russian)
  11. Leontiev D.A. Struktura i narusheniya samoregulyatsii deyatel’nosti: tochka rosta kul’turno-istoricheskoi deyatel’nostnoi psikhologii. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya. 2024. V. 20. № 3. P. 27–35. doi: 10.17759/chp.2024200303(In Russian)
  12. Magomed-Ehminov M.Sh. Deyatel’nostno-smyslovoi podkhod k psikhologicheskoi transformatsii lichnosti. ScD Thesis. Moscow, 2009. (In Russian)
  13. Muzdybaev K. Strategiya sovladaniya s zhiznennymi trudnostyami: teoreticheskii analiz. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noi antropologii, 1998. V. 1. № 2. P. 102–112. (In Russian)
  14. Nartova-Bochaver S.K. “Coping-behavior” v sisteme ponyatii psikhologii lichnosti. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 1997. V. 18. № 5. P. 20–30. (In Russian)
  15. Padun M.A. Regulyatsiya ehmotsii: protsess, formy, mekhanizmy. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2010. V. 31. № 6. P. 57–69. (In Russian)
  16. Rasskazova E.I., Gordeeva T.O., Osin E.N. Koping-strategii v strukture deyatel’nosti i samoregulyatsii: psikhometricheskie kharakteristiki i vozmozhnosti primeneniya metodiki COPE. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ehkonomiki. 2013. V. 10. № 1. P. 82–118. (In Russian)
  17. Sergienko E.A., Vetrova I.I. Sootnoshenie kontrolya povedeniya, sovladaniya i psikhologicheskikh zashchit. In: A.L. Zhuravlev, E.A. Sergienko (Eds.). Stress, vygoranie, sovladanie v sovremennom kontekste. Moscow: Publ. “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2011. P. 275–296. (In Russian)
  18. Frankl V. Chelovek v poiskakh smysla. Moscow: Progress, 1990. 366 p. (In Russian)
  19. Yaltonskii V.M., Sirota N.A. Psikhologiya sovladayushchego povedeniya: razvitie, dostizheniya, problemy, perspektivy. In: A.L. Zhuravlev, T.L. Kryukova, E.A. Sergienko (Eds.). Sovladayushchee povedenie: Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy. Moscow: Publ. “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2008. P. 21–54. (In Russian)
  20. Jaspers K. Filosofiya. Kniga 2. Prosvetlenie ehkzistentsii. Moscow: Kanon+, 2012. 448 p. (In Russian)
  21. Jaspers K. Vvedenie v filosofiyu. Filosofskaya avtobiografiya. Moscow: Kanon+ ROOI “Reabilitatsiya”, 2017. 304 p. (In Russian)
  22. Carver C.S., Scheier M.F., Weintraub J.K. Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1989. V. 56. № 2. P. 267–283.
  23. Haan N. A tripartite model of ego-functioning: Values and clinical research applications. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases. 1969. V. 148. № 1. P. 14–30.
  24. Lazarus R.S. Stress and emotion: A new synthesis. New York: Springer, 1999. 342 p.
  25. Lazarus R.S., Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer, 1984. 445 p.
  26. Menninger K. Regulatory devices of the ego under major stress. International Journal of Psychoanalysis. 1954. V. 35. № 4. P. 412–420.
  27. Skinner E., Edge K. Self-determination, coping, and development. In: E. Deci, R. Ryan (Eds.). Handbook of Self-determination Research. Rochester: The University of Rochester Press, 2002. P. 297–337.
  28. Vaillant G.E. Adaptation to life. Boston (MA): Little, Brown, and Co, 1977.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025