Effect of surface microstructure for corrosion resistance and magnetic properties of an amorphous cobalt-based Co-Si-Fe-Cr-Al ALLOY

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The surface of an amorphous cobalt-based alloy of nominal composition Co75Si15Fe5Cr4.5Al0.5 was modified by nanostructures at anodizing in an ionic liquid – bis(trifluoromethane sulfonyl)imide 1-butyl-3-methyl- imidazolium. The magnetic (saturation specific magnetization and coercive force) and corrosion (corrosion potential and resistance) characteristics of an amorphous alloy before and after electrochemical modification of the surface by nanostructures are compared. Modification of the alloy surface partially changes its magnetic properties. After corrosion tests, an increase in the value of coercive force is observed. Corrosion tests were carried out by the method of polarization curves in Ringer’s solution. The corrosion resistance of alloys modified by oxide nanostructures is higher than the corrosion resistance of a polished alloy. The increase in corrosion resistance is mainly determined by the presence of nanostructures.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

I. I. Kuznetsova

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: lmkustov@mail.ru

Department of Chemistry

Russian Federation, 119991 Moscow

O. K. Lebedeva

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: lmkustov@mail.ru

Department of Chemistry

Russian Federation, 119991 Moscow

D. Yu. Kultin

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: lmkustov@mail.ru

Department of Chemistry

Russian Federation, 119991 Moscow

N. S. Perov

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: lmkustov@mail.ru

Department of Chemistry

Russian Federation, 119991 Moscow

L. M. Kustov

Lomonosov Moscow State University; Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: lmkustov@mail.ru

Department of Chemistry

Russian Federation, 119991 Moscow; 119991 Moscow

References

  1. Chiriac H., Herea D.-D., Corodeanu S. // J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2007. V. 311. № 1. P. 425–428. https://doi .org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.11.207
  2. Louzguine-Luzgin D.V., Ketov S.V., Trifonov A.S., Churymov A.Yu. // J. Alloys Compd. 2018. V. 742. P. 512–517. https://doi .org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.290
  3. Ackland K., Masood A., Kulkarni S., Stamenov P. // AIP Advances. 2018. V. 8. № 5. P. 056129. https://doi .org/10.1063/1.5007707
  4. Xu D.D., Zhou B.L., Wang Q.Q., Zhou J., Yang W.M., Yuan C.C., Xue L., Fan X.D., Ma L.Q., Shen B.L. // Corros. Sci. 2018. V. 138. P. 20–27. https://doi .org/10.1016/j.corsci.2018.04.006
  5. Xu J., Yang Y., Li W., Xie Z., Chen X. // Mater. Res. Bull. 2018. V. 97. P. 452–456. https://doi .org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2017.09.042
  6. Permyakova I.E., Glezer A.M., Savchenko E.S., Shchetinin I.V. // Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys. 2017. V. 81. № 11. P. 1310–1316. https://doi .org/10.3103/S1062873817110144
  7. Han J., Hong J., Kwon S., Choi-Yim H. // Metals. 2021. V. 11. № 2. P. 304. https://doi .org/10.3390/met11020304
  8. Lone S.A., Mardare C.C., Mardare A.I., Hassel A.W. // Meet. Abstr. 2021. V. MA2021-01. № 18. P. 797. https://doi .org/10.1149/MA2021-0118797mtgabs
  9. Hu J., Zhang X., Liu H., Fu B., Dong Z., Wang Y. // J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 2022. V. 35. № 6. P. 1569–1574.
  10. Nyby C., Guo X., Saal J.E., Chien S.-C., Gerard A.Y., Ke H., Li T., Lu P., Oberdorfer C., Sahu S., Li S., Taylor C.D., Windl W., Scully J.R., Frankel G.S. // Sci. Data. 2021. V. 8. № 1. P. 58. https://doi .org/10.1038/s41597-021-00840-y
  11. Hu J., Dong C., Li X., Xiao K. // J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2010. V. 26. № 4. P. 355–361. https://doi .org/10.1016/S1005-0302(10)60058-8
  12. Chernavsky P.A., Kim N.V., Andrianov V.A., Perfiliev Y.D., Novakova A.A., Perov N.S. // RSC Adv. 2021. V. 11. № 25. P. 15422–15427. https://doi .org/10.1039/D1RA01200B
  13. Lebedeva O., Kultin D., Kustov L. // Nanomaterials. 2021. V. 11. № 12. P. 3270. https://doi .org/10.3390/nano11123270
  14. Lebedeva O., Kultin D., Zakharov A., Кustov L. // Surf. Interfaces. 2022. V. 34. P. 102345. https://doi .org/10.1016/j.surfin.2022.102345
  15. Lebedeva O., Snytko V., Kuznetsova I., Kalmykov K., Kultin D., Root N., Philippova S., Dunaev S., Zakharov A., Kustov L. // Metals. 2020. V. 10. № 5. P. 583. https://doi .org/10.3390/met10050583
  16. Lebedeva O., Kultin D., Kalmykov K., Snytko V., Kuznetsova I., Orekhov A., Zakharov A., Kustov L. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2021. V. 13. № 1. P. 2025–2032. https://doi .org/10.1021/acsami.0c19392
  17. Gaikar P.S., Angre A.P., Wadhawa G., Ledade P.V., Mahmood S.H., Lambat T.L. // Curr. Res. Green Sustainable Chem. 2022. V. 5. P. 100265. https://doi .org/10.1016/j.crgsc.2022.100265
  18. Saverina E.A., Zinchenko D.Y., Farafonova S.D., Galushko A.S., Novikov A.A., Gorbachevskii M.V., Ananikov V.P., Egorov M.P., Jouikov V.V., Syroeshkin M.A. // ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2020. V. 8. № 27. P. 10259–10264. https://doi .org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c03133
  19. Uran S., Veal B., Grimsditch M., Pearson J., Berger A. // Oxid. Met. 2000. V. 54. № 1/2. P. 73–85. https://doi .org/10.1023/A:1004650612791
  20. Osei-Agyemang E., Balasubramanian G. // npj Mater. Degrad. 2019. V. 3. № 1. P. 20. https://doi .org/10.1038/s41529-019-0082-5
  21. Pontinha M., Faty S., Walls M.G., Ferreira M.G.S., Cunha Belo M.D. // Corros. Sci. 2006. V. 48. № 10. P. 2971–2986. https://doi .org/10.1016/j.corsci.2005.10.007
  22. Chang A.S., Tahira A., Chang F., Solangi A.G., Bhatti M.A., Vigolo B., Nafady A., Ibupoto Z.H. // Biosensors. 2023. V. 13. № 1. P. 147. https://doi .org/10.3390/bios13010147
  23. Kuznetsova I., Lebedeva O., Kultin D., Kalmykov K., Philippova S., Leonov A., Kustov L. // ECS Trans. 2022. V. 109. № 14. P. 87–94. https://doi .org/10.1149/10914.0087ecst
  24. Zhang L., Xiong X., Yan Y., Gao K., Qiao L., Su Y. // Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 2019. V. 26. № 6. P. 732–739. https://doi .org/10.1007/s12613-019-1803-z
  25. Garcia-Falcon C.M., Gil-Lopez T., Verdu-Vazquez A., Mirza-Rosca J.C. // Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021. V. 260. P. 124164. https://doi .org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.124164
  26. Souza C.A.C., Ribeiro D.V., Kiminami C.S. // J. Non Cryst. Solids. 2016. V. 442. P. 56–66. https://doi .org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.04.009
  27. Skulkina N.A., Ivanov O.A., Stepanova E.A., Shubina L.N., Kuznetsov P.A., Mazeeva A.K. // Phys. Metals Metallogr. 2015. V. 116. № 12. P. 1182–1189. https://doi .org/10.1134/S0031918X1512011X
  28. Vakhitov R.M., Shapayeva T.B., Solonetskiy R.V., Yumaguzin A.R. // Phys. Metals Metallogr. 2017. V. 118. № 6. P. 541–545. https://doi .org/10.1134/S0031918X17040111
  29. Шалыгина Е.Е., Агапонова А.В., Тараканов О.Н., Рыжиков И.А., Шалыгин А.Н. // Письма в ЖТФ. 2011. Т. 37. № 9. С. 37–44. https://doi .org/10.1134/S1063785011050154
  30. Агапонова А.В., Шалыгина Е.Е., Тараканов О.Н., Быков И.В., Маклаков С.А., Пухов А.А., Рыжиков И.А., Седова М.В., Якубов И.Т. // Изв. РАН. Сер. физ. 2011. Т. 75. № 2. С. 200–202. https://doi .org/10.3103/S1062873811020031
  31. Dokukin M.E., Perov N.S., Dokukin E.B., Beskrovnyi A.I., Zaichenko S.G. // Physica B: Condens. Matter. 2005. V. 368. № 1–4. P. 267–272. https://doi .org/10.1016/j.physb.2005.07.020

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Fig. 1. SEM images of the surface of samples 1-6 of the amorphous alloy Co75Si15Fe5Cr4.5Al0.5: (a) before and (b) after corrosion tests in Ringer's solution.

Download (701KB)
Indexing metadata
3. Fig. 2. Linear polarization curves of samples 1-6 of the amorphous alloy Co75Si15Fe5Cr4.5Al0.5 obtained in Ringer solution at the potential sweep rate 1 mV s–1. All measurements were performed using both the anode and cathode regions. The curve numbers correspond to the sample numbers.

Download (255KB)
Indexing metadata
4. Fig. 3. (a) Magnetic hysteresis loops of samples 1, 2 and 4 of the amorphous alloy Co75Si15Fe5Cr4.5Al0.5 before conducting corrosion tests at temperatures T = 298 and 100 K. (b) Magnetic hysteresis loops of samples at T = 298 K after corrosion. The curve numbers correspond to the numbers of the alloy samples.

Download (437KB)
Indexing metadata
5. Fig. 4. The central part of the hysteresis loops of samples of amorphous alloy Co75Si15Fe5Cr4.5Al0.5 before (1, 2 and 4) and after (1k, 2k and 4k) corrosion tests at a temperature of T = 298 K. The curve numbers correspond to the numbers of the alloy samples.

Download (265KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences