Minimally invasive method of surgical treatment of Peyronie's disease

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

Objective. To improve the results of surgical treatment of Peyronie's disease.

Materials and methods. 20 patients with Peyronie's disease aged 22 to 60 were treated in the urological departments of the Private Clinical Hospital “Russian Railways Medicine” and Astrakhan City Clinical Hospital No. 3 named after. C.M. Kirov. A method of surgical treatment of Peyronie's disease using a shortening technique without opening the tunica albuginea includes the application of a pressure tourniquet to the base of the penis, puncture of the cavernous bodies, injection of sterile saline into them until an erection is achieved, determination of the angle of curvature of the penis, removal of the tourniquet and surgery to eliminate curvature of the penis.

Results. Neither postoperative complications nor formation of hematomas were observed. The patients were discharged on the 4th day in satisfactory condition. 1.5 years` observation showed no progression of angular deformation of the penis which could impede sexual intercourse. The mobility of the skin of the penis was preserved.

Conclusions. In addition to the correction of penile deformity, our method eliminates the need for extensive incisions and preserves the physiological functions of the penis. As a result of using this surgical method, the following goals are achieved: minimal trauma to tissues in the surgical area, absence of scar processes in the plastic area and preservation of the skin of the penis mobility, absence of pronounced postoperative tissue edema, no need to drain the wound, reduction of the duration of the operation and minimal blood loss, short postoperative and rehabilitation period.

Full Text

Introduction

The incidence of Peyronie's disease (PD), according to various researchers, ranges from 0.5 to 13 % [1–5], with men over 45 suffering more often. According to the data presented by P.A. Shcheplev, the PD prevalence in Russia ranges from 3 to 8 %, and according to autopsy data, it reaches 25 % [16]. To date, there is no consensus among authors on the pathogenesis of Peyronie's disease, so work continues in this direction, since there is no final verdict on the causes of the disease.

The theory of the development of Peyronie's disease as a consequence of the erect penis trauma has received the greatest recognition. According to the proposed theory, hematomas in the tunica albuginea that occur after microtrauma lead to the development of plaques. It is known that the penis does not have an arterial network, but venous vessels intimately connected with the fibrous part of the tunica. With direct injuries and bruises or during active sexual intercourse, the membranes of the penis are traumatized, which leads to the development of aseptic inflammation. In turn, the inflammatory process inhibits the transformation of fibrinogen into fibrin, resulting in a decrease in the elasticity of the fibers of the protein membrane. Over the course of a year and a half, fibroplastic induration of the tissue develops, in which the degeneration of collagen cells progresses [6; 7].

Peyronie's disease is characterized by the following clinical manifestations: pain syndrome with curvature of the penis; palpated plaques or seals on the penis, erectile dysfunction.

The disease goes through two stages. In the first period, the patient is bothered by pain in the penis during and outside of erection. In the second stage, deformation and curvature of the penis occurs, making sexual intercourse difficult.

In Russia, many clinics use the classification of V.E. Mazo [8], which has four stages: Stage 1 – pain during erection, presence of plaques; Stage 2 – pain during erection and formations on the protein tunica; in the 3rd stage, denser fibers of the protein tunica are formed, in the 4th stage, calcifications are formed.

According to the classification of S. Barra and F. Iacono, used outside of Russia, the disease occurs in three periods: up to 6 months, up to a year and more. The degree of deformation of the penis depends on the size of the plaque and the angle of curvature. Mild deformation (curvature up to 30°, plaque up to 2 cm), moderate degree (60°, plaque up to 4 cm), severe degree (more than 60°, plaque more than 4 cm [9–11].

There are many methods of PD surgical treatment: shortening operations, plication techniques, lengthening operations, grafting using transplants, penile prosthetics in various modifications [20].

The main reason for contacting a urologist is discomfort in a man’s intimate life as a result of penile curvature and pain syndrome.

During examination and collection of anamnesis, attention is paid to penile injuries, concomitant diseases, the size of the plaque, localization, and degree of deformation of the penis in an erect state are taken into account [12–14].

Surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease remains the most effective method of penile curvature correcting [15; 16].

Nesbit was the first to use shortening treatment method that includes opening the tunica albuginea, removing tissue on the opposite side of the penis in the form of an ellipse, with a general satisfactory result from 67 to 100 % [17]. Despite the positive results (79–100 % effectiveness), the operation has a number of complications. This is a shortening of the penis, while erectile dysfunction after the operation occurs in 3.25–22.9 % of cases [4], loss of sexual function, according to literary data, reaches 12 % [9]. One of the modified methods of the Nesbit operation was proposed by P.A. Shcheplev, who invaginated the tunica albuginea without excision of the cavernous bodies [16]. In the 80–90s, D. Yachia and R.J. Lemberger made longitudinal incisions up to 1.0 cm in the zone of maximum curvature without excision of the tunica albuginea and sutured the wound in the transverse direction. According to the authors themselves, the effectiveness of the method ranged from 80 to 95 % [18].

Surgery with intracavernous phalloprosthetics using three-component prostheses is indicated for severe sexual dysfunction [19]. However, the analysis did not yield satisfactory results of plastic surgery using implants, since the high cost of prostheses and the risk of infection do not allow their widespread use.

Due to the fact that the search for new technological methods in the treatment of Peyronie's disease continues, there is a need for a differentiated approach to the choice of corporoplastic surgeries that can reduce the number of postoperative complications and improve treatment results.

Materials and methods

20 patients with Peyronie's disease aged 22 to 60 were treated in the urological departments of the Private Clinical Hospital “Russian Railways Medicine” and Astrakhan City Clinical Hospital No. 3 named after. C.M. Kirov from 2019 to 2022. Patients with a plaque size over 1.5 cm and an angle of curvature of the penis over 45° underwent surgical treatment.

A method of surgical treatment of Peyronie's disease using a shortening technique without opening the tunica albuginea is presented in the following stages: at the first stage a pressure tourniquet is applied to the base of the penis, a sterile saline solution (in a volume of 40–60 ml) is injected into the cavernous bodies until an erection is achieved, the angle of curvature of the penis is determined.

 The second stage is to make three transverse skin incisions 0.3 cm long every 2 cm on the convex side of the penis on both sides of the urethra, then tunnel the subcutaneous space in the proximal direction from the coronary groove to the base of the penis above the cavernous body using a grooved Kocher probe (Fig. 1), after which a piercing needle with a non-absorbable thread (diameter 3–0) is inserted into the distal transverse skin incision, grasping the protein tunica to a depth of 3–5 mm, then this needle with the thread is punctured into the median transverse incision, then the needle with the thread is again punctured into the median transverse incision, grasping the protein tunica to a depth of 3–5 mm (Fig. 2). Then the needle with the thread is punctured into the proximal transverse incision, after which the needle is turned 180°, then the needle with the thread is passed subcutaneously through the formed tunnel to the median transverse incision, and the free distal end of the thread is also passed to the median transverse incision through the tunnel, after which the ends of the thread are tied together, eliminating the deformation of the penis (Fig. 3), then all manipulations of the operation are repeated parallel to the first on the other cavernous body, after which all skin incisions are sutured with interrupted single sutures.

 

Fig. 1. Tunneling of the subcutaneous space with a grooved Kocher probe through transverse incisions of the skin above the corpus cavernosum

 

Fig. 2. Insertion of a piercing needle with a non-absorbable thread into a transverse incision of the skin with capture of the protein tunica to a depth of 3–5 mm

 

Fig. 3. Tightening and tying the ends of the thread together into a subcutaneous knot, elimination of penile deformity

 

Results and discussion

Neither postoperative complications nor formation of hematomas were observed. The patients were discharged on the 4th day in satisfactory condition. The patients abstained from sexual activity for 1.5 months. 1.5 years` observation showed no progression of angular deformation of the penis which could impede sexual intercourse. The mobility of the skin of the penis was preserved. The patients retained erectile function, pain syndrome during erection and curvature of the penis are absent. All patients are satisfied with the treatment results (in the form of an oral survey).

Conclusions

The proposed method (patent No. 2728937 dated August 03, 2020), in addition to the correction of penile deformity, eliminates the need for extensive incisions and preserves the physiological functions of the penis. As a result of using this surgical method, the following goals are achieved: minimal trauma to tissues in the surgical area, absence of scar processes in the plastic area and preservation of the skin of the penis mobility, absence of pronounced postoperative tissue edema, no need to drain the wound, reduction of the duration of the operation and minimal blood loss, short postoperative and rehabilitation period.

×

About the authors

V. А. Zurnadzhyants

Astrakhan State Medical University

Email: zurviktor@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1962-4636

MD, PhD, Professor, Head of the Department of Surgical Diseases of the Pediatric Faculty

Russian Federation, Astrakhan

D. V. Kurashov

Multidisciplinary clinic Euromedprestige

Email: kdmi87@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-1254-1237

Urologist

Russian Federation, Moscow

E. А. Kchibekov

Astrakhan State Medical University

Email: zurviktor@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9213-9541

MD, PhD, Professor of the Department of Surgical Diseases of the Pediatric Faculty

Russian Federation, Astrakhan

А. А. Proskurin

City Clinical Hospital № 3 named after S.M. Kirov

Author for correspondence.
Email: zurviktor@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0220-9652

Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of the Urological Department

Russian Federation, Astrakhan

References

  1. Малей М. Франсуа Пейрони – лейб-медик короля, заложивший фундамент будущего урологии. Медицинские аспекты здоровья мужчин 2014; 4: 61–63 / Maley M. François Peyronie – the king’s physician, who laid the foundation for the future of urology. Meditsinskie aspekty zdorov'ya muzhchin 2014; 4 (15): 61–63 (in Russian).
  2. Аль-Шукри С.Х., Ткачук В.Н. Урология: учебник. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа 2012; 449 / Al'-Shukri S.Kh., Tkachuk V.N. Urologiya: uchebnik. Moscow: GEOTARMedia 2012: 449 (in Russian).
  3. Аляев Ю.Г., Рапопорт Л.M., Щеплев П.А., Попко А.С., Винаров А.З., Чибисов М.П. Комбинированная терапия фибропластической индурации полового члена. Андрология и генитальная хирургия 2003; 4 (2): 41–42 / Alyaev Yu. G., Rapoport L.M., Shcheplev P.A., Popko A.S., Vinarov A.Z., Chibisov M.P. Combination therapy of fibroplastic penile induration. Andrologiya i genital'naya khirurgiya 2003; 2: 41–42 (in Russian).
  4. Калинина С.Н., Тиктинский О.Л., Новиков И.Ф. Фибропластическая индурация полового члена (болезнь Пейрони): пособие для врачей-урологов. СПб.: СПбМАПО 2009; 22 / Kalinina S.N, Tiktinskij O.L, Novikov I.F. Fibroplastic induration of the penis (Peyronie's disease). Posobie dlja vrachej-urologov. Saint Petersburg: Izd-vo SPbMAPO 2009; 22 (in Russian).
  5. Урология. Российские клинические рекомендации. Под ред. Ю.Г. Аляева, П.В. Глыбочко, Д.Ю. Пушкаря. – М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа 2015; 480 / Urologija. Rossijskie klinicheskie rekomendacii. Ed by Ju.G. Aljaeva, P.V. Glybochko, D.Ju. Pushkar. Moscow: GEOTAR Media 2015; 480 (in Russian).
  6. Горпинченко И.И., Гурженко Ю.Н. Классификация болезни Пейрони. Андрология и генитальная хирургия 2002; 3 (1): 107–109 / Gorpinchenko I.I., Gurzhenko Yu.N. Classification of Peyronie's disease. Andrology and genital Surgery 2002. 3 (1): 107–109 (in Russian).
  7. Москалева Ю.С., Остапченко А.Ю., Корнеев И.А. Болезнь Пейрони. Урологические ведомости 2015; 5 (4): 30–35 / Moskaleva Yu.S., Ostapchenko A.Yu., Korneev I.A. Peyronie's disease. Urologicheskie vedomosti 2015; 5 (4): 30–35 (in Russian).
  8. Мазо Е.Б., Муфагед М.Л., Иванченко Л.П. Консервативное лечение болезни Пейрони в свете новых патогенетических данных. Урология 2006; 2: 31–37 / Mazo E.B., Mufaged M.L., Ivanchenko L.P. Conservative treatment of Peyronie's disease in the light of new pathogenetic data. Urologiya 2006; 2: 31–37 (in Russian).
  9. Королева С.В., Ковалев В.А., Лещев Н.В., Выбор метода корпоропластики при болезни Пейрони в зависимости от гемодинамического статуса полового члена. Урология 2005; (6): 26–30 / Koroleva S.V., Kovalev V.A., Leshhev N.V. The choice of corporoplasty method for Peyronie's disease depending on the hemodynamic status of the penis. Urologiia 2005; (6): 26–30 (in Russian).
  10. Kelâmi A. Classification of congenital and acquired penile deviation. Urol Int. 1983; 38 (4): 229–233.
  11. Brant W.O., Dean R.C., Lue T.F. Treatment of Peyronie’s disease with oral pentoxifylline. NatClin Pract Urol. 2006; 3: 111–115.
  12. Smith J.F., Walsh T.J., Lue T.F. Peyronie's Disease: A Critical Appraisal of Current Diagnosis and Treatment. Int J Impot Res. 2008; 20 (5): 445–459.
  13. Москалева Ю.С., Корнеев И.А. Результаты хирургического лечения при болезни Пейрони. Урологические ведомости 2017; 7 (1): 25–29. doi: 10.17816/uroved 7125-29 / Moskaleva Ju.S., Korneev I.A. Results of surgical treatment of Peyroni’s disease. Urologicheskie vedomosti 2017; 7 (1): 25–29. doi: 10.17816/uroved7125-29 (in Russian).
  14. Sommer F., Schwarzer U., Wassmer G. Epidemiology of Peyronie’s disease. International Journal of Impotence Research. 2002; 14 (5): 379–383. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900863.
  15. La Pera G., Pescatori E.S., Calabrese M. Peyronie’s disease: prevalence and association with cigarette smoking: a multicenter population-based study in men aged 50–69 years. European Urology. 2001; 40 (5): 525–530. doi: 10.1159/000049830 (in Russian).
  16. Щеплев П.А., Данилов И.А., Колотинский А.Б. Клинические рекомендации. Болезнь Пейрони. Андрология и генитальная хирургия 2007; (1): 55–58 / Shheplev P.A., Danilov I.A., Kolotinskij AB. Clinical recommendations. Peyronie's disease. Andrologija i genital’naja hirurgija 2007; (1): 55–58 (in Russian).
  17. Nesbit R.M. Congenital curvature of the phallus: report of three cases with description of corrective operation. J. Urol. 1965; 93: 230–232.
  18. Yachia D. Modified corporoplasty for the treatment of penile curvature. J. Urol. 1990; 143: 80–82.
  19. Mufti G., Aitchison M., Bramwell S.P. et al. Corporeal plication for surgical correction of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 1990; 144 (2): 281–282. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39432-6
  20. Кызласов П.С., Мартов А.Г., Помешкин Е.В., Трояков В.М., Капсаргин Ф.П. Лечение болезни Пейрони. Медицина в Кузбассе 2017; 16 (1): 3–10 / Kyzlasov P.S., Martov A.G., Pomeshkin E.V., Troyakov V.M., Kapsargin F.P. Treatment of Peyronie’s disease. Medicine in Kuzbass 2017; 16 (1): 3–10 (in Russian).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Tunneling of the subcutaneous space with a grooved Kocher probe through transverse skin incisions over the cavernous body

Download (98KB)
3. Fig. 2. Insertion of a piercing needle with a non-absorbable thread into a transverse incision of the skin with capture of the protein tunica to a depth of 3–5 mm

Download (133KB)
4. Fig. 3. Tightening and tying the ends of the thread together into a subcutaneous knot, elimination of penile deformity

Download (156KB)

Copyright (c) 2024 Eco-Vector

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 75489 от 05.04.2019 г
.