Cite item


Aim. To optimize the tactics of surgical treatment of iatrogenic extrahepatic bile ducts (EBD) injuries in conditions of specialized clinic. Materials and methods. The nearest and long-term results of treatment of 118 patients who had been treated at Perm Regional Clinical Hospital depending on the type of injuries, terms of their diagnosis, techniques of operative intervention were studied. Results. In case of iatrogenic injuries of extrahepatic ducts, the following techniques were used: hepaticocholedochoanastomoses, hepaticojejunoanastomoses on the defunctionalized by Roux loop with exchangable transhepatic, “lost” drainages and without “frame” drainages, end-to-side choledochoduodenoanastomoses, anastomosis of the major duodenal papilla with the posterior wall of the duodenal stump. After restorative surgeries, complications were diagnosed in 19 % of cases, after reconstructive ones - in 20-28 %, after choledochoduodenoanastomoses - 50 % that was significantly higher than in other groups of patients ( r =0,32; p =0,02). Lethality after restorative operations was 19 %, after reconstructive ones ranged from 0 to 7 %, after choledochoduodenoanastomoses - 13 %, however, the difference was statistically insignificant ( r =0,00; p =0,93). Absence of surgeon's experience in surgical hepatology, formation of choledochoduodenoanastomoses, presence of cicatrically changed tissues in the region of hepatoduodenal ligament while applying biliary-enteric anastomosis contributed to development of strictures in the remote period ( r =0,29; p =0,006, r =0,35; p =0,01 and r =0,35; p =0,001, respectively). Use of frame drainages did not influence development of failures ( r =0,00; p =0,95) and cicatrical strictures of biliary-enteric fistulas ( r =0,1; p =0,41). Conclusions. 1. Application of choledochoduodenoanastomosis for restoration of bile passage after iatrogenic bile duct injuries gives unsatisfactory results. 2. Use of "frame drainages" in case of pathology of hepaticojejunoanastomoses does not decrease the number of failures and strictures of biliary-enteric fistulas. 3. In case of terminal biliary tract injury, anastomosis between the major duodenal papilla and the posterior duodenal wall or the defunctionalized by Roux loop can serve as a variant for reconstruction.


  1. Булдаков В. В. Профилактика ранних послеоперационных осложнений и рубцовых стриктур при высоких билиарных реконструкциях: автореф. дис. … канд. мед. наук. 2012. Пермь 2012; 22.
  2. Гальперин Э. И., Дюжева Т. Г. Лекции по гепатобилиарной хирургии. М.: Видар-М 2011; 536.
  3. Третьяков А. А., Каримов З. Х., Корнилов А. К., Слепых Н. И. Хирургическое лечение интраоперационных повреждений и рубцовых стриктур внепеченочных желчных протоков. Хирургия 1998; 10: 46-505.
  4. Федоров И. В., Славин Л. Е., Чугунов А. Н. Повреждение желчных путей при лапароскопической холецистэктомии. М. 2003; 118.
  5. Bolton J. S., Braasch J. W., Rossi R. L. Management of benign biliary stricture. Surg. Clin. North. Am. 1980; 60: 313.
  6. Calvete J., Sabater L., Camps B., Verdu A., Gomez-Portilla A., Martin J., Torrio M. A., Flor B., Cassinello N., Lledo S. Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: myth or reality of the learning curve? Surg Endosc 2000; 14: 608-611.
  7. De Reuver P. R., Busch O. R. C., Rauws E. A., Lameris J. S., van Gulik Th. M., Gouma D. J. Long-term results of a primary end-to-end anastomosis in peroperative detected bile duct injury. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2007; 11: 296-302.
  8. Eletcher В. R.,Hobbs M. S., Tan P., Valinski L. J., Hockey R. L., Pikora T. J., Knuiman M. W., Sheiman H. J., Edis A. Complications of cholecystectomy: risks of the laparoscopic approach and protective effects of operative cholangiography: a population-based study. Ann. Surg. 1999; 229: 449-457.
  9. MacFandyen B. V., Jr., Vecchio R., Ricardo A. E., Mathis C. R. Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The United States experience. Surg. Endosc. 1998; 12: 315-321.
  10. Stewart L., Way L. W. Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Factors that influence the results of treatment. Arch. Surg. 1995; 130: 1123-1128.

Copyright (c) 2014 Kotelnikova L.P., Burnyshev I.G., Bazhenova O.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 70264 от 13.07.2017 г
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 75489 от 05.04.2019 г

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies